Reflections on journalism education in Singapore

By CHERIAN GEORGE, Associate Professor, Wee Kim Wee School of Communication & Information, Nanyang Technological University.


Journalism education, more than most fields, needs to be grounded in a sense of social responsibility and public accountability. Journalists have immense power to do good or harm: the media have taken over from more traditional social institutions much of the role of providers of information, tradition and moral orientation, becoming “society’s most important storyteller about society itself”.[1] Of course, as university educators, we will have neither the first nor last word in our students’ development. Nor do our graduates have a dominant influence on media performance, since even the biggest employers of our students are (not unwisely) diverse in their hiring: at Singapore Press Holdings, fewer than 10% of journalists are from our School.[2] Nevertheless, we should start with the assumption that what we are able to do matters to society at large.


Journalism can be defined as the use of investigation, interpretation and analysis, to report and comment on current affairs, for the purpose of serving the public’s need to manage complexity and change.[3]

This definition rests on three limbs:

  1.    How journalists work. Journalists investigate, interpret and analyse information, presenting claims in a manner that is, in principle, independently verifiable.[4]
  2.    What journalists produce: news reports and commentary on current affairs.
  3.    Why journalists do journalism. Journalism is committed to public service.[5] Modern journalism is based on the democratic premise of collective self-determination: citizens need reliable and independent sources of information in order to make decisions that affect themselves and their community.


Although this definition seems straightforward, each aspect can be interpreted in different ways. One approach would be to determine the how, what and why of journalism by examining existing industry practices. Teaching journalism then becomes a matter of hot-housing students in the ways of “real world” journalism. This approach has the benefit of socialising students to plug in quickly with their future employers.

From another perspective, however, a university has the social responsibility to educate for the world as it should be, and not just for the world as it is.[6] Not all current practices of the news media should be perpetuated – or deserve taxpayer support in the form of subsidised university education. For example, reporters and photographers everywhere sometimes violate internationally recognised codes of ethics (concerning privacy, for example) because these codes have no regulatory teeth. Training in the “how” of journalism should include a strong dose of media ethics even if – or especially if – these ethical codes are regularly violated in the “real world”.

Similarly, although the “what” of real-world journalism content comprises an increasing proportion of “lifestyle” fluff to satisfy advertisers, and talking heads to fill airtime cheaply, this hardly justifies lifestyle, chat or punditry becoming a dominant part of a journalism curriculum. As for the “why” question, most professional journalists work for companies whose focus is on profit making. From a real-world perspective, the journalist’s role is to provide customers and shareholders with what they are willing to pay for. Again, a normative approach demands a different answer: journalists should think beyond what sells and cater to what society needs.

The different possible foci are summarised in this table:

One of the key challenges of journalism education is to strike the right balance between empirical (real-world) and normative (values-based) approaches. Tilt too much to the former, and we fail our society; swing too much the latter, and we risk producing unemployable students.

The target should be to produce graduates who are positive change agents, able to succeed within newsrooms as they exist today and, over time, effect positive change from within.[7]

> Next page

< Back

1. Stig Hyarvard, quoted in Wolfgang Donsbach, and Tom Fiedler, “Journalism School Curriculum Enrichment: A Midterm Report of the Carnegie-Knight Initiative on the Future of Journalism Education”,  (Harvard, Mass.: Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, 2008), p. 21.
2. Another key source of its talent is SPH’s own overseas scholarships, which are awarded mainly for non-media degree programmes.
3. While there is no standard definition, this formulation is consistent with most.
4. The empirical orientation of journalism, modeled on the scientific method, has been highlighted by Mitchell Stephens in A History of News (New York: Viking, 1988).
5. See, for example, the Committee of Concerned Journalists’ Statement of Shared Purpose (http://www.concernedjournalists. org/statement-shared-purpose)
6. Indeed, journalism’s higher calling – its altruism, self-sacrifice and responsibility to the general public – is the only basis on which it can be called a “profession” and the only valid justification for placing journalism education in a university. Journalism cannot claim to be a profession based on esoteric knowledge and does not want to subject itself to licensing like the established professions of medicine, law, architecture etc. Journalism’s core skills can be (and still are) taught on the job and those without formal qualifications in journalism can practise at a high level. Journalism education has no business being in a university unless that education is steeped in what Thorbjorn Broddason calls its “sacred” aspect. (See Thorbjorn Broddason, “The Sacred Side of Professional Journalism”, European Journal of Communication, 9 (1994), 227-48.)
7. This is not an unrealistic goal. Leading news organisations recognise that their journalists’ professional calling is an asset, not a liability, for their financial bottom line. News organisations’ branding and credibility depends on their journalists having a strong sense of professional identity that transcends their role as mere employees. Their commercial success is based on the creative tension between their professionals (responsible for upholding standards of journalism) and their managers (responsible for financial viability).

Be the first to comment on "Reflections on journalism education in Singapore"

Leave a comment